What sleep training method is the best?
No single sleep training method has been proven 'best.' Randomized trials show extinction, graduated extinction, and bedtime fading all improve infant sleep similarly, with no evidence of harm to stress hormones, attachment, or emotional development.
Gentler methods like graduated extinction take a bit longer but are more popular with parents because they allow more parent-child contact during the process.
Good
Findings rest on several randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews/meta-analyses comparing methods; a few small studies and one older systematic review disagree, especially for babies under 6 months, so certainty is good but not uniform.
What the evidence says
There isn't one 'winner' among sleep training methods. A randomized trial published in Pediatrics compared graduated extinction (checking in at intervals) with bedtime fading (gradually moving bedtime later) against a no-training control group, and found both methods significantly cut how long babies took to fall asleep and how much they woke overnight, with no rise in stress hormone levels and no differences in attachment security or emotional/behavioral problems a year later. A broader review of psychologists' recommendations describes the two main approaches: standard extinction ('cry it out'), where parents don't respond to crying after a consistent bedtime routine and usually see results within three to five days, and graduated extinction, which is slower but lets parents check in periodically and is generally more popular for that reason.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral sleep interventions found they reduce child sleep problems and improve mothers' sleep quality, though the same review did not find a clear effect on the exact number of night wakings or on maternal depression, showing the benefits vary by outcome measured. A small pilot trial comparing a gentler 'responsive' approach with controlled crying found sleep results were similar between groups, but mothers using the responsive method reported less stress, suggesting the 'best' method may depend on which outcome (baby's sleep vs. parental stress) matters most to your family. One dissenting systematic review focused on infants younger than 6 months concluded that behavioral sleep training in that very young age group hasn't been shown to reduce crying or prevent later sleep or mood problems, and flagged a risk that pushing sleep training too early could backfire.
This lines up with general advice that most structured sleep training is designed for and studied in babies 6 months and older. No Canadian body has issued a guideline ranking sleep training methods against each other; Canadian pediatric sleep sources focus more on safe sleep practices and general sleep hygiene than on picking a single 'best' training technique.
Sources
-
Guideline
Behavioral Interventions for Infant Sleep Problems: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Pediatrics (American Academy of Pediatrics)
RCT: graduated extinction and bedtime fading both effective, no harm to stress or attachment
-
Guideline
CE corner: Helping children get a good night's sleep
American Psychological Association
Describes extinction vs graduated extinction methods and their typical timelines
-
Guideline
Getting Your Baby to Sleep
HealthyChildren.org (AAP)
General AAP guidance on letting babies learn to self-settle
-
Systematic review
Behavioral sleep interventions in the first six months of life do not improve outcomes for mothers or infants: a systematic review
PubMed
Dissenting review: little benefit and possible risks when applied under 6 months
-
Randomised trial
Do responsive sleep interventions impact mental health in mother/infant dyads compared to extinction interventions? A pilot study
PubMed Central
Small RCT: similar sleep outcomes, less maternal stress with responsive method
✓Reviewed by CH, MD, FRCPC
Reviewed by a specialist physician certified by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, who has read this answer against the sources listed above and confirmed it reflects them. That is not medical advice about your child. How we review
Answer checked August 1, 2026